|
Link
Apr 21, 2006 22:47:32 GMT -5
Post by Michael on Apr 21, 2006 22:47:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Link
Apr 21, 2006 23:07:24 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on Apr 21, 2006 23:07:24 GMT -5
Thanks Michael This is a great story to help identify a possible set of leads to solving the case. I suspect there may be a reason other than money that there are so many persons with the same memory that involves the work of Dr. Carrel, but the only way to find out is to compare their memory knowledge.
|
|
|
Link
Apr 22, 2006 10:16:50 GMT -5
Post by rick62 on Apr 22, 2006 10:16:50 GMT -5
DNA Evidence still rules! In the news blurbs below the story of Paul Hustead (now Charles Lindbergh Jr.) a cold murder case is solved in Sacramento after 33 years.(see link above for 21 April). DNA might yet solve the LKC just as soon as someone figures out how to apply this revolutionary technolgy to the existant evidence.
|
|
anne50
Junior Member
Posts: 73
|
Link
Apr 23, 2006 15:41:48 GMT -5
Post by anne50 on Apr 23, 2006 15:41:48 GMT -5
All the people claiming to be Charles Lindbergh, Jr. would have to submit to DNA testing, wouldn't they, in order to see whether their claims are valid? Would they cooperate long enough to be tested? Speaking of DNA, wouldn't Charles and Anne Lindbergh have to be alive so that the results of the tests can be compared to the results of the tests done on the multiple "Charles Lindbergh Jr.'s", or could the DNA tests of the other children of Charles and Anne Lindbergh be compared to the tests of the men claiming to be young Charles? anne50
|
|
|
Link
Apr 23, 2006 19:34:25 GMT -5
Post by rick62 on Apr 23, 2006 19:34:25 GMT -5
Well, yes and no? If CAL and anne are still alive that would be news? Their children and grandchildren can be used for comparison genetic typing as was done for the small village of CALs in Germany. but in that case, only CALs alleles (genes) need be present for the kids to claim him as DAD. It does get slightly more dicey to prove you are the child of both Anne and CAL if thier kids arnt donating any DNA. Of course, Charlies DNA would be fun to test too but the Family removed all traces from the NJSP barracks in Wilburtha. It pays to have power, priveledge and moola. Robert Aldinger tried to test against the children in Germany but they wanted him to sign some complex documents so the test was derailed in legal mumbo jumbo. Stalemate. Our best and last hope is that some creative PI follows the family around and picks up thier beer bottles and cig butts. If I thought I was The Missing Lindbergh Baby you can bet i would hire someone.
|
|
|
Link
Apr 23, 2006 21:21:38 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on Apr 23, 2006 21:21:38 GMT -5
I have a theory that (CAL, Carrel, Gangsters, Etc.) used the many Charles Jr's. as decoys so that the real Charles Jr. would never be found. Dr. Carrel did early research on memory DNA, as trained mice DNA was injected to untrained mice then they could run the maze like trained mice. Each one of the Charles Jr's. have common memory of family events, that may be able to lead back to the true culprit in this case.
|
|
anne50
Junior Member
Posts: 73
|
Link
Apr 26, 2006 12:03:42 GMT -5
Post by anne50 on Apr 26, 2006 12:03:42 GMT -5
Rita, I read the story about Husted in Ronelle's forum, and I have to admit that it sounds genuine. He seems to know something, but he could have been coached to give that particular account. I would imagine that any of the "Charlies" out there could have been coached to give certain accounts of what they remember from March 1, 1932. anne50
|
|
|
Link
May 2, 2006 20:42:17 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on May 2, 2006 20:42:17 GMT -5
Anne, you are right on publicity seekers and trust fund seekers, and I suspect if there was a real Charles he wouldn't want publicity.
|
|
|
Link
May 20, 2006 22:53:59 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on May 20, 2006 22:53:59 GMT -5
|
|
kathy
Junior Member
Posts: 78
|
Link
Sept 2, 2006 13:08:41 GMT -5
Post by kathy on Sept 2, 2006 13:08:41 GMT -5
the lindberghs didn't seem to care about those bones in the state police museum until DNA became known. then they wanted the bones. why?
|
|
|
Link
Sept 3, 2006 2:58:36 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on Sept 3, 2006 2:58:36 GMT -5
Hi Kathy This is certainly proof that not only the body found was not Charley's, but that also if the body is not Charley's some form of greed, guilt, family cover up protection is the real motive.
|
|
|
Link
Aug 7, 2008 23:45:22 GMT -5
Post by Rita Witt on Aug 7, 2008 23:45:22 GMT -5
Weird spooky, but that is a good possibility and description of what may have happened. His story coincides with my Roosevelt, Onassis, Kennedy post, and my theory of Lindbergh-Forrestal covert operations,and that would also imply Truman's need for confiscating Forrestal's papers that might have had information on who might have been involved in the kidnap and for what reason. I think his story is very interesting and also verifies what I've told on the discreet investigation's that Keyhoe was part of. I would like to find out if Husted could identify Keyhoe as an investigator? Although Mr. Husted identifies Italian Mobsters in the kidnap, it was also mostly Purple Gang "Sigman" and the reason for the the demise of Purples who were trying to influence our politics with kidnappings. Husted should understand that with our tilted court system he has as much chance at rightful testament, as I have to collect my family trust fund. Our judicial system only recognizes, weight of paper, most money spent, or lodge degree in dispensing justice, and those without or less get none. Thanks to Rick who found this Lorne Husted interview with Weird N.J. Magazine. The interview had many relevant statements to the kidnapping as I have noted above. www.weirdnj.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=113&Itemid=28
|
|