|
Post by Rita Witt on Nov 27, 2006 20:59:24 GMT -5
Ernie and others in this case fall in and out of suspicion too easily, and only do so because of Violet's death. This is a clear indication that Violet had information that others feared at Morrow House, and also interesting that Dwight Jr. and Lindbergh were so close to her suicide.
|
|
|
Post by rick for rita on Nov 28, 2006 13:23:35 GMT -5
Hi rita/ in the LKC any alibi is a good alibi? If it doesnt fit the pattern of known truths the first go around, then you are given more time to "make it fit"? Everyone gets away clean.
No harm/no foul is the policy.
Brinkerts first alibi fails--its modified and masaged
Red Johnson--first two alibis fail--modified to fit all others. Reds first alibi is "the Movies in Englewood" go figure that?
Violet Sharpe--first two alibis fail--but she cant figure out how to fix it even though given weeks and months to recant and reconsider?
Violet has to die! (The Dixie Chicks)
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Nov 29, 2006 7:29:07 GMT -5
Hi Rick A person could have gotten rich just writing alibis for Lindberg's and Morrow's. It's strange how other sites sometime make excuses for Cal, when he had a bad early stunt pilot reputation. I thought the gals would surely see the female reporters questioning of Cal with no answer I posted as a plain to see indication to gals in particular that he was slightly less than honorable. I can't believe they made excuses for him
|
|
|
Post by rick for rita on Nov 29, 2006 12:28:09 GMT -5
the Gang of Four have fuzzy or unconfirmed alibis for March 1st:
Henrik Finn Red Johnson--first a movie, then he leaves for CT, last he drives around w/ Margarite Junges until 11:15? Sure
Violet Sharpe--first a movie, then to the Peanut Grilll in East Orange one hour from Englewood(?), then suicide
Ernie Brinkert--first to Honesdale PA to visit his step dad , then to Bridgeport CT to visit Frank Page and wife/ doesnt hold water and it looks like he got there on Wed pm?
Edna Sharpe--now living in NYC, she went to a movie alone and cant remember the title
|
|
|
Post by rick on Nov 30, 2006 20:33:50 GMT -5
Betty Red and Violet are interviewed at Highfields by CAL/ this isolates them and whatever they say. This way thier stories can be masaged and tuned up to meet the created hoax. CAL needs to keep all the various hoax plots spinning at the same time like china plates. If anyone plate falls and breaks the jig is up/ Also there is no need to have any records kept about what CAL tells those he talks to and they would all be intimidated at Hopewell. As soon as CAL talks to them "poof" they are innocent. Appaently Violet could not figure out the complexity of the game they were all playing. Red was never let out into public again. Betty was the best soldier....but then she had to be--she was the last person to see Charlie jr alive and well/
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Nov 30, 2006 22:56:17 GMT -5
Hi Rick Sounds like they were rehearsed by Ma Barker and gang, and she would say they are good children. It fits perfectly, as Violet is there weak link, and Cal keeps control of Hopewell employees. This is certainly not standard police procedure, and a real police investigation would have pitted each party against the other. The butler does look very suspicious.
|
|
|
Post by rick4 skeptic5 on Dec 2, 2006 12:58:36 GMT -5
Rita/ yes and for certain Betty Morrow's statements about Violets innocense "after her death" are more than disingenuous and patronizing? or is it matronizing?
Violet is feeding info to the Daily News (Tom Mckilvie) and the NYTimes (?) and making a buck off that? Shes picking up strange men, or Red Johnson, and going out to bar and grills--but only one nite in over two years? DYBT? She sure as hell is not engaged to (maybe with) the olde dude Septimus Banks--maybe in his wildest dreams when he gets back from the Sha-toe or Harlem after a nite of boozing?
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Dec 2, 2006 22:04:58 GMT -5
Could it be the employees were cooperating with Morrow Lindbergh families, as we know that often shady characters enter into political infighting? If they part of political deceptions, then the kidnap might have figured into the why of Violet's death? Even Nosovitsky is standing in line with grudges against the family.
|
|
|
Post by rick for rita on Dec 3, 2006 13:30:48 GMT -5
Rata/ all we know for certain is that Morrow/Lindberghs are the 1932 eguivalent of: The Gods of Olympus: Power, Money Position. My bets are on "Accident/Coverup" just like Jonbenet/
Servants pretty much do exactly what they are told to do even if they realize they have been tricked or fooled. If CAL can shoot the cops, well he can easily poison a chamber maid. The servants are powerless. Septimus Banks ends up in some Institution within one calander year?
Its a wonder that PD James or Agatha Cristie didnt get ahold of the Violet Sharpe suicide case in the midst of 30 servants, Betty Morrow, Dwight Jr. and CAL and Anne? whos kidding who--it would have been the ultimate who dunit, and the solution would not be suicide?
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Dec 5, 2006 21:32:19 GMT -5
The staff were especialy fearful of within these homes over reputations of Lindy and Dwight Jr. What was the problem that Banks died from, and could it have been Lindy-Itis?
How many of the servants died after Charley dissapeared, and doesn't it seem odd that so many ran or died?
|
|
|
Post by rick for rita on Dec 6, 2006 12:54:51 GMT -5
Well, aparently, the Lindbergh-Morrow families are hard on thier servants? but you dont have to be dead to have your life ruined:
Betty Gow--her lifes dreams are shattered, starting with Red Johnson's deportment? She dies an olde spinster, childless.
Violet Sharpe--RIP [Edna Sharpe lives to be interviewed by Norris]
Septimus Banks--likely a chronic alcoholic, institutionalized twice in 1932 maybe to dry out/
Ollie Whateley--dies mysteriously of a bleeding ulder and cremated
Henry Ellerson--looses his driving priveledges w/ DUI becomes nite watchman?
Margareite Junge heads back to Hamburg ASAP
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Dec 7, 2006 1:16:05 GMT -5
The employees were affected by their kidnap hoax, and their family might be not only a source of information, but may be able to participate in a class action. Many of those affected next generations were altered negativly, and may be able to participate in a class action against the case.
|
|
|
Post by rick62 on Mar 6, 2007 10:51:25 GMT -5
michael--cant say that I know anything about Brennan's Employment Agency....Ellerson and Banks buddy operated the B and M Taxi Company in Englewood. Ernie Brinkert-Brennan overstated his alibi by saying "I've never even been to NJ"? Way too much information as he headed for Alpine PD?
It would have made for alot cleaner case if only Ernie Brinkert would have been interviewed at Highfields by CAL? I wonder why he wasnt--apparently only Red and Violet got these honors?
We all know that Violet Sharpe was interviewed at Highfields so that her room could be searched for the silver polish and the Post Road Taxi Cards. Trouble is noone, including Lloyd Gardner ,can discern which interview went down to Highfields? Was it the one with Shiable, McGrath and Stong from Newark PD on March 10th? What should be so simple ends up being most mysterious?
Oddly enough, these same three cops drove all the ways to Hartford, CT to interview Red Johnson too? Before he was brought back to Jersey City NJ "voluntarily"? Red Johnson also got a special interview down at Highfields, but not until after Violets? Maybe Red went down on March 19th?
Funny thing is moments after Shiable McGrath and Strong interviews with Violet and Red...they dissappear from the LKC. Enter stage Left: Condon, Schwartzkopf and Harry Walsh?
|
|
|
Post by rick62 on Jul 20, 2007 14:02:48 GMT -5
We are now smart enough to realize that the entire Newark PD and mayor was bought and paid for by Abner "Longy" Zwillman, beer baron, in cohoots w/ Dutch Schultz and Waxey Gordon.
That means that the interviews by Shiable, McGrath and Strong of Red Johnson and Violet Sharpe could have been broadly edited to preclude any involvement of rumrunners or gangsters?
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Jul 20, 2007 20:12:53 GMT -5
Hi Rick Yes, the case seems lacking in logic, police scruples, or proper judicial reasoning, because there must have been more official payoff than there was ransom. The no fingerprints in nursery means they paid off from the very first day, and is the real reason Schwartzkopf turned the case over to Lindbergh, as it was the only thing that could have saved him from officially labeling his and employee statements as lies. If that would have been brought to public attention as properly should have the case would have ended there, and there would have been no need for the manufactured evidence that followed.
|
|