|
Post by rick on Dec 3, 2006 19:11:55 GMT -5
Ernie Brinkert is surely an unlucky guy, whether he is guilty or not. He was working as a butler(?) for a guy named Clyde A. Moody in Mamaroneck NY in February 1932? After Violet Sharpe starts lying--Ernie gets sucked into the LKC by her lies and also that he drives a 1929 green Nash coupe or coach? (A closed automobile, usually with two doors.) Somehow, probably thru Edna, Ernie's Post Road Taxi Cards are discovered in violets room at Next Day Hill when searched? Ernie is only quizzed about knowing Violet? and John Condon says he sure isnt Cemetary John? or Cemetary Ernie either? But what makes Ernie look guilty are the following: - He quits his job with Moody on 1 March 1932 and says he is headed for the woods of Honesdale PA?
- His alibi for the nite of the snatch is immediately disproven. He says he and wife Mary head instead for Frank Pages house in Bridgeport Ct. and that they arrived at 10pm?
- Wrong--Frank and wife say they arrived Wednesday March 2nd--doesnt this remind you of Red Johnsons alibi too?
- Ernie was picked up from a "home" in NYC by Thomas Brennan of Honesdale Pa when he was 13. When he was 18 Ernie went back to the city to be with "family"? Whos that?
- Ernie has two wives, but forgot to get divorced from the first one when he married Mary in 1931?
- Ernie is shot and killed in 1939 by a guy that he sold the gun to for $4.00. Ernies luck went downhill and 6 feet under?
|
|
|
Post by Rita Witt on Dec 3, 2006 21:38:48 GMT -5
what is realy remarkable about this case is that you cannot believe any victems or suspects. This is what created the never ending case, and proves that something other than what is claimed happened. If nobody knows what realy happened, how can you prove who did it?
|
|